Mr. Tăpălaga seems very angry.
I did not make him a “securist”.
I explained and I will detail how he was the SRL-Coldea’s tool.
Why is he angry?
For SIPA reasons, for ANAF reasons.
We are no longer in 2016 when the prime minister called for an “informal meeting” a number of companies and asked them to “help” Hotnews.
As with PFA-Kovesi, Mr. Tăpălagă does not answer a simple question.
Has he been at Coldea or not?
There is no shame, Mr. Tăpălagă, you can offend me in every way, but come out like a man and say: How was on Coldea’s couch?